“GIVE CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE.” says the chart…
Seems like a fair statement, but somehow folks still don’t think twice about using other people’s images without proper attribution.
Obviously the image I just posted is not mine. It belongs to a couple of designers. Their names are written along the lower right margin.
So I was prompted to post this after a friend on a growing social media site found out one of his pictures was used for a premium blog theme sale, without his permission.
To add insult upon insult, he was neither credited nor compensated for the use of his picture. Note that the premium theme in question sold over 700 times for $35 (each time). You can do the math.
You can see the photo and theme here (sorry, dead link since posted; the photographer and the developer were in talks over it as I wrote this).
Obviously the sale of the theme was not for the photo itself, however to measure the impact of the photo on successive sales is beyond me. All I know is that if Tommy Lee Jones found out his image was used for Boss canned coffee without his consent nor compensation, saying that Boss only sells coffee will not keep the lawyers away.
Unfortunately, my friend is not famous, and will probably get nothing out of the infringement. Under amicable terms he might get some free advertisement, but that’s all.
“What can I do to avoid this?” The answer is, “Nothing.”
But you can make it more official. US law more or less protects stuff like this without you having to file paperwork. You can set your permissions in some photo-sharing sites like Flickr.
I always close my posts here with a link to The Creative Commons (below). You can get some ideas there. You can also watermark your work, but there are ways to remove that, too, even on an iPhone.
If you liked what you saw or read, please +1 me or share below ☺
I believe in The Creative Commons.
It’s an all-too familiar sight in Japan: smokers in clearly marked non-smoking areas.
Since coming to Asia, it has been interesting to see how well the tobacco industry is actually doing. After seeing a series of litigative defeats in my own country, I thought surely the industry was hurt. Perhaps so, but upon seeing vending machines along streets, and staggering reports that more than 50% of Japanese men smoke (or had smoked) made me realize that Asia is still in the 1950s.
Generally, local ordinances are in place around train stations and schools. Many visitors to Japan will notice increased signage for many things, so plenty of signs are printed, taped, mounted on poles, and even cemented into sidewalks and stairs. Fines can be 2,000 Japanese Yen on the spot, but I have never spotted anyone being stopped …except by my camera.
Apparently nothing stopped this old timer from enjoying a mid-afternoon puff.
If you liked what you saw or read, please share below ☺
I believe in The Creative Commons.
I recently blogged on my 500px.com page about how we are, in addition to technology, a work in progress in of ourselves. I’m speaking from a photographer’s point of view. We often get lost in the process as we focus on our ever-advancing camera gear.
It got me thinking.
I wasn’t looking for a definitive answer or a closing point, but was instead raising that idea for the sake of staying in the moment. Maybe then I could remain aware of myself as I carry on with my photography.
So if the subject of photography is anything other than yourself, the photographer, then why would being aware of yourself be important? I cannot answer that for you, but for me it’s important.
It helps me to balance my presence in, say, street photography where I’d rather remain unseen. More deeply, it helps me to see what impulses are making me frame a subject like so, or choose this or that for a subject. It helps me keep tabs on what affects my work.
But this idea is certainly not restricted to photography. It can pertain to anything.
Are you a teacher? A student? A parent?
It seems silly to ask that as if any of it matters, but it is necessary. No matter what our lives are about, we are all moving from one place in our lives to another. Change is constant.
Does that also seem silly or odd-sounding? Maybe, but saying all of that is not supposed to give answers. I’m just creating a question. Leaving the question open, no matter how simple it is, allows us to keep our realm of understanding fresh. It’s like a door. A shut door will not allow anything in, or out.
Within this environment we can better remain in the present, more acutely tuned into each breath of change as it happens. And if we’re lucky, we can sense the moment of opportunity where we can better control our choices, actions, and destiny.
I’m very interested in expanding my sense of what the ethics are for street photography.
Eric Kim posted the same issue a few days ago here. He made some great points, including the idea that taking pictures of kids should be fine. I want to agree with that, but there is a part of me that is wary. Having a child of your own will do that; it’s easy to see both sides. No matter, taking pictures of anyone requires sensitivity. Some people won’t protest, but we may never know whether they cared or not.
Nevertheless, the question of ethics in street photography remains elusive, and perhaps only the individual can arrive at their own private conclusion.
Eric Kim’s post begin’s with Bruce Gilden‘s quote, “I have no ethics.”
What about you? Would love to get comments on this one. I promise there’s no judgement from me; I’m no one to cast a verdict.
Joel Meyerowitz said, “I wandered the streets, not knowing what I was shooting…I just knew I had to be out there, watching life…”
He goes on to explain the beautiful exchange between the subject and the artist, the expansion of awareness, and how the subjects (people) help the artist (the photographer) to become more of themselves through the experience.
After hearing him say all of that, I feel he really touched what intrigues me about Street Photography. He really articulated the excitement of venturing out into unknown possibilities with possibly great results! It’s beautiful.
More on this prolific, and rather philosophical artist can be found here.
Here’s a pro at work, Bruce Gilden, profiled in The New Yorker.
I am impressed by his boldness, and for that matter, the risk he takes at possibly photographing the wrong person!
For more of Bruce’s work, click this. As he states in his own words, “I’m known for taking pictures very close, and the older I get, the closer I get.”
What is “Street Photography”? Click here. It’s a good example. I suppose “Street Photography” is about people, unposed people, actually. Some add that it’s also things, stuff, and other daily sights that for some reason get your attention enough to warrant a picture. One of the iN-Public photographers said that street photography is about expression, reaction, interaction, etc… I suppose that could apply to more than humans. Animals react: birds on a power line. In-animate objects “react”: a bag hovering on a windy day.
The website http://www.in-public.com/ has a manifesto that basically states that pictures help remind us of what’s going on around us. In other words, the over-familiar is too easily forgotten, so street photography is about staying in touch.
Why am I even writing this? I guess I just wanted to say it and see my own thoughts on it. I’m intrigued by good street photography. It’s an art-form to catch someone off-guard, in that perfect moment of light and circumstance. I guess I’m thinking about it so I can become better at it. I want to display better moments in my collection, and not just in-animate things. Japan is rather iconic. She’s easily seen in traditional light, but there are more current, deeper things happening. I’d like to tap into that more.
Thanks for reading